Tech Peak » Comparing AWS and Azure Storage Pricing and Features in 2022

Comparing AWS and Azure Storage Pricing and Features in 2022

by Pratik Mistry
aws vs azure cloud services

The Cloud war is raging, and two behemoths are battling it out. The epic AWS or Azure bout is in full swing, with enterprises across sectors waiting for an outcome to choose the better among the two. However, things aren’t that simple. Each platform has its own advantages and niche use cases, and deciding between the two will have to go to the scoring panel. For the uninitiated, here’s a quick rundown of our combatants.  

AWS

Amazon Web Services began as a pure cloud service aimed mostly at smaller businesses and developers, with a concentration on Linux and a variety of databases. AWS has extended this early toolset at a breakneck pace, adding tools and features for so many different functions that even the most ardent AWS observers can’t keep up. AWS is the platform of choice if you want a massively powerful platform that can perform nearly any cloud function, regardless of the operating system. 

AZURE 

If you’re a Microsoft firm with a lot of money invested in the Microsoft way of doing things, from Windows to Active Directory to SQL Server and Visual Studio, Azure is definitely the way to go. Furthermore, unlike AWS, Microsoft has a strong enterprise presence. It is aware of the needs of corporate clients. Migrating from on-premises to Azure with Microsoft’s Azure cloud migration services is simple and typically requires no change.  

But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Read on for a detailed comparative analysis of AWS vs. Azure, which is better in terms of pricing and storage. So without further ado, let’s get to it. 

AWS VS Azure: A Clash of Titans

Gone are the days when “rapid” data access necessitated raw provisioning storage inside the server. Today, there are a plethora of cloud storage companies vying for your data, and you may mix and match storage amongst them.  

Which One Is Best For You When It Comes To Object Storage? 

In this post, we’ll compare Amazon S3 and Azure Blob storage services side by side and show you how NetApp’s Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you get more storage out of either public cloud service. 

1. Cloud Collective Intelligence 

Before we go into a direct comparison of Amazon S3 vs. Azure Blob, it’s important to think about the type of business you run. 

In the startup world, there’s minimal hesitancy in going directly to the cloud for all of your storage needs. Startups rarely consider purchasing large amounts of onsite network-linked storage (NAS). 

As a firm grows, it may make use of the cloud’s collective storage wisdom by adopting a cloud-based Network Attached Storage (NAS) solution, which saves time and provides high availability. Microservices that talk to each other are used by flexible startups to construct their apps. Each microservice has its own best-practice solution. Some of these require Azure or AWS NoSQL databases that are fast, inexpensive, and versatile, while photos are saved on Amazon S3 or Azure Blob 

What about more well-established small and large businesses? Old on-premise NAS systems are too clumsy and expensive to replace, and with pay-as-you-go invoicing, businesses may save money on their IT budgets by switching to the cloud. They don’t need to buy the storage they estimate they’ll need in the next few years because they can scale up with the cloud. 

To merge their legacy NAS and local block storage systems with their new cloud storage requirements, most businesses want a hybrid solution. There are excellent hybrid solutions available that allow users to manage all of their traditional storage from the same interface that they manage their highly available distributed data on AWS and Azure. 

2. Block Storage: AWS vs. Azure Cloud 

Your files are divided into equal-sized chunks when you use block storage. This allows users to swiftly alter only a tiny portion of the data.  

Now for the AWS-Azure service comparison: Elastic Block Storage (Amazon EBS) is the basic storage device for Amazon EC2. A block storage device is also used by Azure Virtual Disks that link to Azure Virtual Machines. A block device holds the whole server image. Because it does not spin and is integrated with memory, an SSD is substantially faster. 

When you inadvertently harm your virtual machine, it is promptly copied. Although AWS stores the snapshots on Amazon S3, they are also saved on block storage. The Amazon S3 panel and Amazon S3 API do not provide access to snapshots saved on Amazon S3. Snapshots are another feature of Cloud Volumes ONTAP (previously ONTAP Cloud) that can be used with either cloud provider. Because they simply transfer data that has changed rather than rewriting the full copy, ONTAP snapshots are more cost-effective and take less time to create. 

You can use Azure to run your own operating system that you’ve saved as a VHD file. You upload the VHD to a Blob using Azure File Storage. When you delete a virtual machine in Azure, the original VHD file is also lost and is no longer recoverable. With Amazon, you do not lose the picture while deleting a VM generated from your own image. 

To mount Amazon EBS or Virtual Disks, you’ll need to set up a VM. Even if you only need access to a small configuration file, the disk must first be mounted on a virtual machine. You must first disconnect the volumes in order to expand or minimize cloud block storage.  

Connected block storage is often faster for databases and local applications. AWS now provides provided IOPS SSD for significantly faster read and write speeds. Adding more Virtual Disks to Azure provides you with more IOPS per disk. 

Azure vs AWS Storage Pricing 

The cost of AWS and Azure storage pricing varies by region, but we’ll look at prices in similar parts of the United States as an example. 

  • Amazon EBS charges $.045 per GB for HDDs and $.10 per GB for SSDs. Prices increase as the number of IOPS increases. Free tier: receive a free 30 GB SDD. 
  • For HDD, Azure virtual disk costs $.05 per GB. Monthly SSD storage costs $19.71 for 128 GB. 
  • Azure now offers Azure Managed Disks, a sort of Virtual Disk that is more flexible and easier to back up than Amazon EBS or Azure Virtual Disks. You can alter the volume size and available IOPs, unlike the other choices. You may also easily schedule a snapshot, albeit, unlike Amazon EBS snapshots or Cloud Volumes ONTAP (previously ONTAP Cloud) snapshots, the snapshots are not incremental. Azure Managed Disks are available for $19 per month for 128 GB and 500 IOPs. 

When it comes to cloud block storage, think of it in the same manner that you would like a local drive on your computer. These allocations may be controlled centrally with Cloud Volumes ONTAP, regardless of whatever cloud you choose to work in (formerly ONTAP Cloud). 

Object Storage: AWS vs. Azure Cloud 

Let’s compare AWS S3 vs. Azure Blob in terms of object storage. 

In this Azure blob storage vs. Azure AWS S3 comparison, object cloud storage is another category of cloud storage to consider for your data. All of the data is saved together in object storage. You can’t modify sections of the item as you can with block storage. 

Managed object cloud storage enables you to store as much data as you require. The largest Amazon S3 and Azure items are approximately 5 TB in size. Before you begin such heavy lifting, you must have a well-organized application design. Shipping parcels with petabytes of data to them is faster than using the fastest Direct Connect connection available. 

1. S3 – Static Website Settings  

The 800-pound gorilla of cloud storage is Amazon S3. It has the most features, has been around the longest, and numerous apps have been created using it. Cpanel includes an Amazon S3 backup solution. Although Amazon S3 cannot be mounted as a network disk natively, Dropbox can. Dropbox allows you to access Amazon S3 files from any device. Netflix’s video streaming service is also stored on Amazon S3. 

Amazon S3 has the unique benefit of being able to serve as a static website for any domain. Simply give the bucket the same name as the domain and use Amazon DNS to point to it. From the AWS Panel, Amazon S3 offers simple security, backup, and deletion schedule. 

Serverless programs that use Lambda or Azure functions can access code stored on Amazon S3 or Azure. By requiring block storage for VMs, the distinctions between them can be blurred. 

You can save money and gain access to broad APIs by using Amazon S3 or blobs for your applications. Azure Blobs can only be accessed through the Azure Portal or using a programmatic API. The software can be written in whatever language you like. Azure has integrated Amazon S3 API Proxy, so any application that already uses Amazon S3 can simply update its DNS to refer to Azure. 

The data tiering capability of Cloud Volumes ONTAP (previously ONTAP Cloud) with object storage is one advantage. It levels data that is accessed infrequently from high-performance storage to less expensive object storage. This ensures that you don’t overpay for storage for data that isn’t used frequently while keeping it accessible in case you need it later.

2. Network Attached Storage (NAS) in the Cloud (NAS) 

Previously, whether it was hard drives, NAS storage, or tape backup systems, you had to plan ahead of time and acquire more storage to anticipate the application’s storage needs. You may now securely store large amounts of data in the cloud without incurring any upfront costs or over-provisioning. 

Azure File Storage is a simple-to-use service provided by Azure. Create a new file share in your Azure storage account.  

Amazon EFS can be mounted on Amazon EC2 servers. Amazon EFS mounts files using NFS V4.0/4.2. However, it’s only available in four AWS locations right now. To install them on-premises, you’ll require a VPN or Direct Connect line to AWS, so Amazon EFS isn’t immediately accessible. 

Conclusion 

Regardless of who wins the AWS vs. Azure battle, the sky is the limit for cloud storage. Consider your requirements for a few moments before configuring them. Here is where opting for Azure or AWS development services can help.  

Startups have long been known for being adaptable and quick to change, whereas corporations have a reputation for moving slowly and taking a long time to adjust. The cloud’s new scalability alters the nature of this notion. We trust that this article will prove informative. Until next time, happy developing! 

You may also like

Leave a Comment